| Case Number |
Activity Date |
Activity Type |
|
| Case Name |
|
| Summary |
|
| 21-0632-PSD-C |
10/05/2021 |
Incoming Document |
View PDF
/ Text
/ Download
|
| Mary Dicken v. Kingmill Valley Public Service District |
Hard Copy - Response on behalf of Colfax PSD, filed by The Thrasher Group
|
| 21-0632-PSD-C |
10/04/2021 |
Incoming Document |
View PDF
/ Text
/ Download
|
| Mary Dicken v. Kingmill Valley Public Service District |
Response on behalf of Colfax PSD, filed by The Thrasher Group
|
| 21-0632-PSD-C |
09/27/2021 |
Incoming Document |
View PDF
/ Text
/ Download
|
| Mary Dicken v. Kingmill Valley Public Service District |
Second Hard Copy - Answer to Formal Complaint, including cover letter omitted from previous filings, filed by Counsel for the Defendant
|
| 21-0632-PSD-C |
09/24/2021 |
Incoming Document |
View PDF
/ Text
/ Download
|
| Mary Dicken v. Kingmill Valley Public Service District |
Hard Copy - Answer to Formal Complaint, filed by Counsel for the Defendant
|
| 21-0632-PSD-C |
09/24/2021 |
Incoming Document |
View PDF
/ Text
/ Download
|
| Mary Dicken v. Kingmill Valley Public Service District |
Answer to Formal Complaint, filed by Counsel for the Defendant
|
| 21-0632-PSD-C |
09/17/2021 |
Process |
View PDF
/ Text
/ Download
|
| Mary Dicken v. Kingmill Valley Public Service District |
Executive Secretary's Letter evidencing service of Procedural Order issued 09/14/2021 upon whom electronic service was unsuccessful.
|
| 21-0632-PSD-C |
09/17/2021 |
Process |
View PDF
/ Text
/ Download
|
| Mary Dicken v. Kingmill Valley Public Service District |
Executive Secretary's Letter evidencing service of Procedural Order issued 09/14/2021 upon whom electronic service was unsuccessful.
|
| 21-0632-PSD-C |
09/14/2021 |
Order |
View PDF
/ Text
/ Download
|
| Mary Dicken v. Kingmill Valley Public Service District |
Procedural Order that KVPSD file a formal answer to each complaint within ten days of the entry of this Order; that Colfax PSD is added as a party to each complaint. Colfax PSD will file a duly verified formal answer to each complaint within ten days of the entry of this Order; etc.
|
| 21-0632-PSD-C |
09/10/2021 |
Memo |
View PDF
/ Text
/ Download
|
| Mary Dicken v. Kingmill Valley Public Service District |
Initial Staff Memo filed by: Hirst, Brooke
|
| 21-0632-PSD-C |
09/10/2021 |
Incoming Document |
View PDF
/ Text
/ Download
|
| Mary Dicken v. Kingmill Valley Public Service District |
Motion to Join the Colfax Public Service District as a Respondent, filed by Staff
|
| 21-0632-PSD-C |
09/10/2021 |
Incoming Document |
View PDF
/ Text
/ Download
|
| Mary Dicken v. Kingmill Valley Public Service District |
Motion to Consolidate Case Nos. 21-0623-PSD-C, 21-0631-PSD-C, and 21-0632-PSD-C, filed by Staff
|
| 21-0632-PSD-C |
08/27/2021 |
Incoming Document |
View PDF
/ Text
/ Download
|
| Mary Dicken v. Kingmill Valley Public Service District |
Party response to offer of mediation from Stephen Brown - offer accepted.
|
| 21-0632-PSD-C |
08/17/2021 |
Order |
View PDF
/ Text
/ Download
|
| Mary Dicken v. Kingmill Valley Public Service District |
Commission Procedural Order requiring the Defendant to satisfy the formal complaint or make answer, in writing, within ten days of service; referring to ALJ for decision by 3/15/2022
|
| 21-0632-PSD-C |
08/17/2021 |
Process |
|
| Mary Dicken v. Kingmill Valley Public Service District |
Case offered for mediation.
|
| 21-0632-PSD-C |
08/17/2021 |
Incoming Document |
View PDF
/ Download
|
| Mary Dicken v. Kingmill Valley Public Service District |
New case filing received.
|